chipmunk – Linda J. Spielman

A Family Resemblance

Rodents are the most common mammals on earth, in both number of individuals and number of species. They are also the most diverse, with lifestyles that range from semiaquatic through fossorial (adapted for digging and living mostly underground), terrestrial, arboreal, and even semi-aerial (gliding flight). But don’t let that mind-boggling profusion intimidate you. In our region many of the most common rodents are members of the squirrel family, a group that is remarkably uniform in physical features. Fortunately for the tracker this uniformity extends to track details and track patterns, and familiarity with the key features will aid in the recognition of any member of the group.

In the photo below you see tracks made by a gray squirrel bounding toward the top of the photo. The five-toed rear tracks lie in the upper part of the image, and the four-toed front tracks can be seen in the lower part. Claw marks show as tiny pricks ahead of the toes of both front and rear tracks. Notice that the toe pads of the three middle toes of each hind print are lined up close together, while the inner and outer toes lie farther back and angle to the sides. Behind the toes you can see a C-shaped grouping of middle pads. The front tracks have only four toes, but again the central two point more forward while the outer and inner ones point to the sides. C-shaped arrays of middle pads sit behind the toes of the front prints, and heel pads (there are two on each foot, but it’s hard to tell in this image) are situated behind the middle pads.

Bounding is the most common gait for most members of the squirrel family, and the resulting pattern is another recognizable trait of the group. In the photo above the two rear prints are almost even with each other and are set wider and well ahead of the front ones, which are also nearly even with each other. This positioning may seem odd, but there’s a logical explanation. At each bound the animal lands on its front feet and draws its rear feet forward so they pass outside of its front legs. As the front feet lift off the rear feet touch down–ahead of the spots the front feet just left–and propel the next leap.

The next photo shows a bounding pattern made by a red squirrel, again travelling from bottom to top. There’s a striking similarity to the first image of the gray squirrel tracks, in both overall arrangement and track details. Because the substrate was softer the rear feet of the red squirrel (in the upper part of the frame) sank in deeper–notice that the whole length of each of the three middle toes registered as a narrow groove. Nevertheless the three toes are closer together and oriented more forward than the outer toes, just as they were in the gray squirrel tracks. In the front tracks of the red squirrel (in the lower part of the photo below) the claws show as grooves rather than pricks, but the overall structure is similar to the front tracks in the preceding shot. If you look at the red squirrel’s right front print (at the lower right in the photo below) you can see clear impressions of the two heel pads.

The chipmunk tracks in the next photo (again bounding toward the top) are consistent with the features we saw in the red and gray squirrel prints. In the right rear print (in the upper right quadrant) you can see that the middle toes are closely grouped and the inner and outer toes are angled to the sides. The left front track (in the lower section a little below and to the left of the right front track) shows the four clawed toes, the C-shaped grouping of middle pads, and the two heel pads.

Mud is great, but winter is also fine for seeing squirrel family connections. In the photo below of red squirrel tracks in snow (bounding toward the top, of course) you see the same characteristic features you saw in the mud tracks. As sometimes happens, the heel area of the right rear foot (at the upper right of the photo) registered as a flattened area behind the middle pads. (If you look back at the first photo of the gray squirrel prints you’ll notice that the heel area of the left rear foot also made a slight impression.) There’s a variation in the arrangement of the front tracks, with the right front well behind but the left front farther forward. This kind of foot placement is often seen in squirrels, but is less common than the more four-square pattern.

Flying squirrels possess gliding membranes (the patagium) which extend between the front and rear legs, and because of this the rear feet can’t pass as far ahead of the front feet as they do in red or gray squirrels. In the next photo you see a bounding pattern made by a southern flying squirrel (oriented toward the top) in which the front prints are situated between rather than behind the rear prints. In northern flying squirrel trails the front prints often lie ahead of the rear ones. Another special flying squirrel trait is the thick covering of fur on the undersides of the feet. Because of this flying squirrel prints rarely show the crisp detail found in the tracks of other members of the squirrel family. But even with these differences, flying squirrel tracks will remind you of the tracks of other squirrels.

In the next image you see a bounding pattern made by a woodchuck. If you didn’t realize that woodchucks belong to the squirrel family, the familiar features of their tracks should make that clear. Woodchucks are more likely to walk than bound, and when a woodchuck does bound it usually places its front feet in a staggered pattern rather than even with each other, as in the photo. Nevertheless, the overall arrangement and the track details are consistent with those of its relatives.

To complete the picture for small rodents in the Northeast we need to add a few creatures that don’t strictly belong in the squirrel family but leave distinctly squirrel-like prints. These include white-footed mice, meadow voles, and their allies. I include mouse and vole allies because each one represents a group of closely related species which are difficult to distinguish from tracks alone.

First, let’s look at tracks of the white-footed mouse, shown below in a bounding pattern heading toward the upper right. In spite of its smaller size, the animal made tracks that are uncannily similar to the tracks in the first three photos. If I didn’t tell you that an individual rear print is just half an inch across you’d be hard pressed to tell these tracks from squirrel tracks.

Vole tracks also show striking similarities to the tracks we’ve already discussed–but with a few important differences. In the next photo you see tracks made by a meadow vole bounding from bottom to top. The track sequence, starting at the bottom, is: right rear, right front, left rear, left front. This staggered arrangement is common in vole trails and differs from the more consistent four-square bounding patterns usually seen in white-footed mice and tree squirrels. Voles can leave more regular bounding patterns, but they often move at something between a bound and a lope and their track patterns tend to be more variable. The toe impressions in vole tracks also tend to be more finger-like than the toes of mice. In spite of these differences the tracks of voles will remind you of mouse and squirrel tracks.

This is all well and good, you may say, but if these creatures are so similar to each other, how can I tell them apart? I’ve mentioned a few variations that can be helpful, but often the most useful trait is size. There’s a neat size progression, and although there’s some overlap between adjacent species it’s usually possible to make an identification with a few measurements combined with other clues. There are two dimensions to consider: track width (more reliable than track length) and bounding trail width (measured perpendicular to the direction of travel across the widest part of a bounding pattern). I’ll focus on the big picture rather than giving an exhaustive account of the numbers–detailed measurements can be found in any good tracking guide. White-footed mice and the smaller voles (woodland voles, for example) are the tiniest of the lot, and meadow voles are slightly larger. Chipmunks come next, and southern flying squirrels are slightly larger than chipmunks. Northern flying squirrels outweigh their southern kin, and red squirrels are larger yet. Gray squirrels beat out red squirrels, and woodchucks complete the series. These differences in body size are reflected in differences in track and trail dimensions, so a few measurements are usually sufficient to clinch an ID. Even when the tracks you’re dealing with are in the overlap zone there are usually other clues that can point toward an identification. And when all else fails, it’s okay to say you just can’t be certain. If you treat each situation as a learning experience, you’ll find yourself stumped less and less often.

Sorting Out the Small Rodents

Rodents are considered one of the most successful groups of mammals, so it’s not surprising that the northeast hosts many different kinds. They range in size from the tiny woodland vole (weighing an ounce or less) to the beaver (50 pounds or more). The small ones dominate, both in abundance and in their potential to confuse. Most of these little creatures are active in winter, so it’s a perfect time to get a handle on their distinguishing features.

The photo below shows a set of prints made by a red squirrel bounding from left to right. The five-toed rear tracks are nearly even with each other and set widely, their three middle toes parallel and their inner and outer toes diverging. The four-toed front tracks are set more narrowly and staggered, and their four toes are slightly splayed. Behind the toe impressions, the middle pads of both front and rear feet (analogous to the bumps over the knuckle joints in your palm and the ball of your foot) appear as clear indentations. The heel pads of the front tracks (like the heel of your hand) show in both right and left front prints, and the heel area of the right rear track (analogous to the heel of your foot) is a smooth elongation behind the middle pads.

Here’s a chipmunk group of four, with the direction of travel this time toward the top. The left front and rear tracks are partly superimposed, but the similarity to the tracks in the first photo is plain to see. This is what I call the rodent foot plan, and once you absorb it you’ll recognize it in other small rodents, including squirrels, chipmunks, mice, and voles.

But there are some variations which–if available–can be important in pinpointing an identification. The photo below came from the bounding trail of a southern flying squirrel, an animal similar to a chipmunk in body size (although lighter in weight). Compare the middle pads in the right rear tracks (the farthest to the right in each photo): in the chipmunk they’re well separated and form a sharp curve. The middle pads of the flying squirrel are closer together and form a gentle crescent.

If your reaction to that is, ‘you’ve got to be kidding!’ you’re not far off base. It’s a real difference, but snow conditions are rarely perfect enough to see that kind of detail. So how often can we be sure which small rodent made the tracks we’re seeing? Quite often, it turns out, because we have two additional diagnostic tools: trail width and habitual movement patterns. The tracks in the photo below, a white-footed mouse bounding toward the upper right and a gray squirrel bounding toward the lower right, are similar arrangements but are vastly different in size. In this case it’s easy to know which is which, but for less obvious differences, such as red squirrel versus gray squirrel, measurement of the overall width of the pattern, known as the trail width, can really help.

To measure the trail width of a bounding animal, imagine or mark lines parallel to the direction of travel which touch the outermost parts of the two rear tracks. Below you’ll see the same photo with lines delimiting the trail widths. Next, measure the distance between the two lines. The nice thing about this is that the trail widths of our most common small rodents fall into a simple size progression. In inches, trail widths for white-footed and deer mice measure 1 1/4-1 3/4; chipmunks, 1/1/2-2 3/4; red squirrels, 3-4 1/2; and gray squirrels, 4-6. At 1 3/4-3 inches the trail width for southern flying squirrels is similar to that of chipmunks, and northern flying squirrels, at 2 3/4-4 1/4 inches, overlap on the low side with red squirrels. Although trail width can be determined for any gait, the bounding gait so common in small rodents is especially suited to this measurement.

Habitual movement patterns are another useful tool for identifying small rodents. In the next photo a gray squirrel bounded at a good clip from bottom to top, leaving groups of four prints separated by relatively long distances. In each group of four the landing tracks of the smaller front feet are behind the take-off tracks of the larger rear feet. Bounding trails of red squirrels and chipmunks are similar in overall proportions. It’s not that these animals always make long leaps. If they’re moving slowly the distances between the groups of four can be smaller, and the hind feet may not pass as far ahead of the front feet. Compare the arrangement of the gray squirrel prints in the previous photo with that of the slower moving red squirrel in the opening illustration. The point is that the habitual travelling movement of these animals creates trails with characteristic four-track groupings and relatively large spaces between groups.

Compare the pattern above to the next photo, the trail of a southern flying squirrel, bounding from lower right to upper left. In this trail the larger rear prints are behind the smaller front ones, and the distance between the groups of four is smaller. In the trails of northern flying squirrels the rear tracks are often ahead of the front, but both species of flying squirrels have sacrificed strength for lightness and aerodynamic design and are unable to match the long leaps of their non-gliding relatives.

Snow depth can affect the foot placement of bounding rodents. To the white-footed mouse that made the tracks in the photo below the snow was fairly deep, so the groups of four are reduced to sets of two, each of the paired impressions made by sequential impacts of front and rear feet from the same side. All of the rodents I’ve been discussing do this when deep snow makes it more energy efficient. But even in these reduced patterns trail width can still be measured, as long as we make sure we’re looking at the actual tracks and not the larger openings around them. And like squirrels and chipmunks, mice make shorter leaps when moving less energetically. An example of mouse trails with consistently shorter leaps can be seen in the opening photo of last month’s article.

Meadow voles are chunkier and have shorter legs than white-footed mice, so they can’t make long leaps, but their trails are roughly as wide as those of mice. It’s not always easy to tell whether a bounding trail with short leaps was made by a vole or a mouse, but if the trail goes on long enough differences usually show up. A vole’s foot placement is rarely as even and foursquare as that of a mouse, and voles tend to make frequent shifts in gaits. It’s not unusual for an individual vole trail to vary among lopes, bounds, trots, overstep walks, and scurrying gaits that are difficult to categorize. In the next photo there’s a partly roofed vole tunnel meandering between the lower right and the top center. A vole traveled from the left side of the frame toward the tunnel in a bounding gait, with typical short leaps and uneven foot placement. The thin line in the center of the trail was made by the tail.

If you’ve made it this far in this treatise, you may feel like your brain is reeling. Believe it or not, I had to leave out many details, and I haven’t even addressed the issue of distinguishing small rodents from other small mammals. The important thing is to get started. Every time you work through a small rodent puzzle you’ll learn more. So be patient and persistent, and enjoy the eureka! moments when a few puzzle pieces fit together to form part of the larger picture.

Logs

Living creatures see the world in terms of significant objects. We humans are no exception–for us significant features would be such things as chairs, doorways, computers, streets, buildings, picnic tables, traffic lights….you get the idea. For wild animals rocks, thickets, streams, cliffs, and trees come to mind. And then there are logs–items that we usually ignore unless we’re looking for a place to sit. Downed logs are important to many animals in many different ways, and the evidence is often plain to see.

A chipmunk sat on the log in the photo above to eat a red oak acorn. In order to get at the edible meat, the animal tore narrow strips and small chunks from the outer covering. Logs serve as feeding platforms for many small rodents, including red and gray squirrels, and the leftovers often reveal who the diner was. When squirrels feed on red oak acorns, the shell fragments left behind tend to be larger than those discarded by chipmunks.

The log above was used by a red squirrel feeding on red pine cones. As the squirrel fed it dropped the cone scales and cores on the ground in front of the log to create a large midden. Red pines are self-pruning trees and don’t offer many branch perches, so although red squirrels prefer the safety of branch perches, they sometimes need to use more earth-bound objects. Logs, stumps, and rocks can offer a good view of the surroundings and allow the animal to detect danger.

And how do we know it was a red squirrel? Although gray squirrels do sometimes eat conifer seeds, they don’t store them the way red squirrels do, and they never feed on enough conifer cones to create middens the size of the one in the photo.

Tracks on logs tell us that they can also serve as travel routes. Of course we need snow to see this kind of evidence–the light snowfalls of early winter and early spring often show the prints of animals that walked on logs. The coyote that made the tracks in the photo above found the log to be a convenient route through an area obstructed by branches and undergrowth. Walking on logs may also be quieter since leaves and debris can be noisy, even under a layer of snow. Another advantage of walking on logs is a better view. The greater elevation helps prey animals to detect danger, and predators to detect prey. I’ve found many different tracks on logs–the list includes squirrels, white-footed mice, chipmunks, raccoons, bobcats, bears, red and gray foxes, coyotes, fishers, minks, and weasels.

Logs offer these same advantages when there’s no snow, so we can be sure that animals also walk on logs in warmer weather. Without snow their tracks are difficult to detect, but we may still find evidence of their passing. A long-tailed weasel left the scat shown in the photo above on a mossy log. The scat was not quite 1/4 inch in diameter and contained hairs from a small mammal.

The logs in the photo at the head of this article are ones I visit regularly, and they often accumulate the scat of several different kinds of animals. This suggests that they have some special importance, but I’m not sure exactly why. The log in the foreground bridges a low, rocky gully, but the more distant one lies on more level ground. Both logs are large, but there are other logs nearby that are as big or bigger and don’t accumulate scat. Whatever the reason, we can be sure that each species that travels those logs takes note of the messages left by other creatures.

In addition to serving as perches, travel routes, and bulletin boards, logs may be a source of food. This log was torn open by a black bear in search of the grubs that were living and feeding in the rotting wood. Bears are not the only creatures that find food in logs–skunks, raccoons, and woodpeckers also open logs in search of edible morsels. But the size of the fragments and the distance to which they were thrown could only have be the work of an animal as powerful as a bear.

Have you heard a grouse drumming this spring? At this time of year ruffed grouse are looking for mates. The males seek out large logs, and once they find a log that offers a stable and well elevated surface they send out a kind of drumming sound with their wings. The low sound travels long distances, and the elevation of the log gives it even more range. Females are drawn to the sound, and if they’re impressed they will mate with the male. In the photo above I’m perched on a grouse drumming log, taking a photo with my old SLR camera. In front of me on the log you can see several grouse scats.

Whether they’re dinner tables, highways, message boards, pantries, stages, or even just obstacles, logs are significant objects for inhabitants of the natural environment. The evidence they present can reveal unseen dramas in the lives of animals. So before you sit on that log, take a look at it. You might be rewarded with a message that opens a window into the life of a wild creature.

Incisive Communication

Communication is an essential part of life for all animals. For squirrels and their kin spring is a time of intensive communication, as they select nest sites and prepare to birth and raise young. And the leafless canopy of early spring affords good visibility, so it’s a great time to spot the messages left by these animals.

The strong, sharp incisors possessed by all rodents–two in the upper jaw and two in the lower–are perfect tools for inscribing messages. In the photo below bright gouges show where a squirrel bit into the sides of a narrow cleft in a tree. The cleft was at eye-level, so the reddish marks of the animal’s incisors were easy to see. After making the bites the animal may have rubbed its cheeks on the bark to leave a scent message. Squirrels have a well developed sense of smell, so the saliva left in the bites and the scent from the cheek rubbing may have been even more meaningful than the visual marks.

Squirrels also create “stripes” on tree trunks. In the next photo gray squirrels–probably more than one–made many bites in an elongated zone between four and six feet off the ground along the trunk of a white oak. If you look carefully you’ll see that the individual bites vary in color, from bright reddish (the most recent) through grayish red to dull gray (the oldest). The varying age of the bites indicates that this stripe has been worked in the same way over several years. The individuals making the bites probably also did some cheek rubbing, so the bark would have been perfumed with an abundance of scents.

Marks like the ones pictured above are usually found in the general vicinity of nesting or feeding areas, but sometimes the bites seem to indicate a claim to a particular nest site. I’m not talking about summer nests, the leafy dreys seen high in the branches of large trees. In areas with cold winters, both winter and birthing nests are located in safe, weather-proof sites like hollow trees or underground cavities, and the supply of good sites may be limited. The hole shown in the photo below was located about 20 feet up in a large tree. There was probably a perfect nest cavity inside–the opening looked well used, and the varying intensity of the bitten areas suggested that the site had been used for at least several years. By marking the opening, the resident squirrel was able to establish ownership of its chosen refuge.

Squirrels are not the only creatures associated with tree holes. The openings shown below were made by pileated woodpeckers. From a distance the bright margin of a woodpecker hole may look like the chewed edges of a squirrel hole, and the size and shape may be about right. But it’s easy to tell that these holes are not squirrel holes. The first clue is their rough, splintery margins. Another clue is the number of holes–in this case there were five similar openings distributed along the trunk. These holes were made for feeding, and they’re distributed up and down the trunk because the insects the woodpecker was seeking–probably carpenter ants–had colonized much of the tree. Woodpecker holes are often more irregular in shape, and when that’s the case it’s easy to tell that they weren’t chewed on by squirrels.

Whether a mark was made by a red or a gray squirrel is often hard to determine–both are known to make stripes along trunks, and both probably mark the entries to nest cavities. Flying squirrels may mark in similar ways, but I haven’t been able to find any mention of that in the tracking literature and I don’t have any examples to share. If anyone knows the location of a definite flying squirrel nest hole, I’d love to hear about it.

Chipmunks tend to use underground refuges rather than tree cavities, and I haven’t seen anything in the literature about chipmunk marking. But a few weeks ago I came across the hole in the photo below, located a little above my head in a small tree. It puzzled me at first because the chews looked rougher and more irregular than the typical squirrel chew. But the mystery was solved when I stood on my tip toes to get a closer look. Out of the hole came the frantic chittering of a chipmunk. The animal sounded so upset that I left quickly, but I thanked it for showing me what a chipmunk can do with its teeth.

Lessons from Flying Squirrels

The weather has been unusually cold and snowy for early November, and there have been days when conditions were perfect for seeing detail in the tracks of small animals–an icy base with about half an inch of new, soft snow on top. On one of those days I went to a location where I had seen flying squirrel trails in past years, and I found some beautifully detailed prints. In the photo on the right (direction of travel to the right), the right rear track is at the bottom of the frame, and the right front is just above it. The other two prints are at the top, the left rear just behind the left front. The toes and middle pads show up nicely in both front and rear tracks. The heels of the rear prints made impressions, and the paired heel pads of the right front track can also be seen.

Now compare the shot above with these chipmunk tracks, photographed on the same day and arranged almost identically except that the left front track is just below the left rear. There’s a similar amount of detail, with toes and middle pads clearly visible in both front and rear feet and the paired heel pads showing in both front feet. I had hoped that if I found really detailed tracks I would see features that would separate chipmunks and southern flying squirrels, but to my eyes there are no appreciable differences between the tracks in the two photos. The dimensions are similar as well: both sets of prints have a trail width (the distance from the right edge of the right rear print to the left edge of the left rear print) of 2 inches, and the length of the front track is 9/16 inch for the flying squirrel and 5/8 inch for the chipmunk, not significantly different. So how did I know that the tracks in the first photo were made by a southern flying squirrel, while those in the second belonged to a chipmunk?

The answer came from the differing trail patterns. Southern flying squirrels have flaps of skin (patagia) that connect the front and rear legs all the way out to the ankles, so they move differently from chipmunks (and also from tree squirrels, for that matter). The front tracks of a bounding southern flying squirrel are set almost as wide as the rear, and they are usually in front of, or occasionally between, the rear tracks. Because of the skin flaps, flying squirrels are not as fleet-footed on the ground as other small rodents, so their leaps are shorter. Compare the southern flying squirrel bounding trail in the photo above (traveling from bottom to top) with the next photo of a trail made by a chipmunk (traveling from top to bottom). In its normal traveling bound the chipmunk consistently places its rear feet ahead of its front, and its leaps can be much longer than those of the flying squirrel. Of course chipmunks do sometimes make short leaps, and they do sometimes place their front feet between (as in the second photo of the blog) or ahead of the rear. That kind of pattern in a chipmunk trail is an indication of a break in the rhythm, while it falls withing the normal bounding pattern for a southern flying squirrel. (By the way, neither of the bounding photos came from the day I took the close-up shots, but they illustrate the trail patterns I saw that day.)

More snow changes everything. All bounding animals switch to what I call a double-register bound when their feet sink deeply into the snow. The trail pattern consists of sets of two impressions more or less side-by-side, created when the rear feet come down in the holes just made by the front feet. For an animal the size of a flying squirrel even a few inches of soft snow can be enough to change its gait pattern from its normal bound to a double-register bound like the one in the photo at the right (direction of travel from lower right to upper left). The relative positions of front and hind prints no longer apply, but trail width can still be measured, and this trail had a trail width of 2 1/8 inches, squarely in the range for the southern flying squirrel. A chipmunk trail would have had a similar trail width, but the trail pictured above was made during a long stretch of cold weather. Chipmunks wait out winter’s coldest periods in a state of torpor in their underground refuges, while flying squirrels come out regularly even in frigid temperatures.

Feet Tell the Story: Family Resemblances Among Small Rodents

The smaller the creature, the tinier the feet–and the less often we’re able to see the kind of detail that we’re accustomed to seeing in the tracks of larger creatures. So I was delighted a few weeks ago to find these beautifully revealing chipmunk tracks. The one that first caught my eye was the right rear print that lies off by itself in the lower right part of the photo. The much larger rear print of a gray squirrel lies above it, and at least two other chipmunk tracks are visible among the unrelated disturbances in the upper part of the photo. The chipmunk’s right front print sits in the left part of the frame midway between top and bottom, and its left rear print can be seen above the squirrel track. The left front print isn’t obvious but a few small depressions suggest that it lies above the right front in the upper left quadrant of the photo. The chipmunk was moving toward the right.

The two right prints of the chipmunk show excellent detail, so I’ve focused in on them in the photo to the left. The toes and claw marks are visible, four of each in the front track (at the upper left) and five in the rear track (at the lower right). Behind the toes you can see the grouped depressions that make up the middle pads of both the front and rear tracks. For such a small creature those tracks are exquisite.

Why do I get so excited about such stuff? The finely formed details of animal tracks contain such energy and elegance that I just love to look at them. But beyond that, track details can reveal an animal’s affinities, in this case the affinities between chipmunks and other small rodents. The gray squirrel tracks in the next photo (moving toward the top of the frame, rear prints above and front prints below) help to illustrate the important features shared by this group. In the rear prints the central three toes lie close together and point forward, while the inner and outer ones sit farther back and are angled to the sides. The four toes of the front prints are spread more or less evenly. The middle pads of both front and rear feet are made up of four depressions, arranged in a crescent in the rear and a more triangular shape in the front. In the front print the heel pads, located just behind the middle pads, show as small paired depressions.

There are lots of rodents, and some have foot structures that depart from the characteristics I just described. But our most common small rodents–including one even smaller than a chipmunk–are surprisingly consistent in showing this suite of features. It took perfect mud to register the details in these white-footed mouse tracks (heading toward the top of the photo), but the family resemblance comes through clearly. The numbers and arrangements of the toes are the same, and the middle pads of both front and rear prints are similar to those of the chipmunk and the squirrel. You can even see the heel pads, albeit slightly smeared, in the front tracks!

Family resemblances can extend to the gait level as well, and they certainly do here. Widely placed rear prints and more narrowly placed front prints, positioned behind the rear ones, represent a typical pattern for bounding or jumping small rodents. Of course this pattern changes when different maneuvers are required, and even at a steady bound the four tracks aren’t usually as perfectly placed as the ones in the snow photo of the gray squirrel. But both gait patterns and track details are useful clues to the identities of our most common small rodents.